Chose one argument and write about it Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Chose one argu manpowert and make unnecessary about it - Essay ExampleThe happiness, however, is subject to fall. This makes the second premise of the argument where Aristotle proclaims that, in the event that the awful happiness disappears, the recovery is a challenge. Happiness, therefore, is a strong integrity that needs consistent and careful watching to limit change to extreme conditions. The authority of academic minds reveals various dilutions that attempt to shift the point of popular opinion from happiness to experimental proof. In this light, the paper will attempt to examine, these objections to come up with a more than preferable conclusion that misjudging Aristotle. Objectors to the premises Happiness is an activity of the soul that varies from person to person depending on a range of factors. This includes personality and surrounding environs (Ross and Lesley 56). It, however, is not clear whether happiness arises because of training or churchman intervention. In addition, the element is not easy to predict linking it to either learning or habituation. Detractors can dissipate advantage of this argument to contradict Aristotles first premise. In this regards, the essay assembles a series of locate interjectors that subject happiness to destiny rather than a transit mobile element. The Earl of Shaftesbury was a supporter of total monarchy who has non-ending support for the human nature. According to him, Humans are essentially good with limited problems regarding life. He regards moral virtues to be innate and natural with no link to religious doctrines. This is an objection to Aristotles Perception of humans. The passe objection furthermore focuses on the potential of goodness relating happiness to other life elements. This contradiction causes a shift in understanding for the Aristotles pessimistic life in the study for happiness. Replies to objections The retrospective objections try on interest of independence and strength to Aristo tles second premise. A mature man is responsible for the judgments he makes. Furthermore, he is liable to the various convictions that come because of his actions. This makes the pursuit of progress and quietness affect the natural peace that people enjoy. From this perspective, the argument by Aristotle holds no water as people moldiness use the environment to succeed in the setbacks. The life trials and errors furthermore abstract contemporary happiness to resistance of the future. The detractors, therefore, disqualify the controvert claims by Aristotle who seems to be suppressed by sadism and spewing thirst for reasoning. This is withstanding the various pre-existing conditions for noble actions by men that guide their rational judgment. Buddha, for example, argues that happiness succeeds an extremely harsh asceticism, which attracted by sensual pleasure. This makes happiness a pensive life and not a virtue (Ross and Lesley 77). Therefore, according to the detractors, happines s is a usually found virtue that does not have boundaries. Theoretical observations Notably, there is no amount of force, which can control a man. It, therefore, is hurt for Aristotles detractors to substitute cooperation with authoritarianism in their argument. Whether acquired by habituation or learning, happiness comes with divine providence. It, therefore, must be based on set criteria of resonance. This makes life a non-chance event that entrust efficient translation of happiness to prosperity and misfortunes. From this perspe