Dulce Et Decorum Est Essay

World War One was a time of divisions, not only between countries but between the different people within one country. In populacey west fightd countries the propaganda convinced young work force to enlist to portraying war as a great seek and the Germans as an imminent enemy The Huns. But as news came back from the westward Front and Gallipoli, there was a perceive that the war was not glorious, the dirtiness, the sheer loss of life was arising to be revealed through numberss such as Dulce et Decorum Est.However, with enlistment numbers dropping, the image of a noble, adventurous war needed to be reaffirmed and this can be found in Whos for the Game, by Jessie pope. In this poem, pontiff, affirms messages of jingoism as skilfuleous and justified. She describes England as up to her neck in a fight and that the right course of action is to grip and tackle the job unafraid using sporting allusions to make the war seem like a game. For example, this game is played, the enem y is tackled as a rugby player would attack an opponent, and the entire war is just a show.One could take a john in the stand and be out of the fun or toe the line. This sporting imagery, unawares removes the idea of war as a bloody, dirty, nightmarish suffering and transforms it into an exciting prospect. It attacks the ratifiers sense of manliness, affirming Edwardian vox populis that men prove themselves under fire in war and also the chivalric notion of helping your country, personified as a woman stuck in a fight and also the idea of difference fellow soldiers behind by not joining in the fun.On the other hand, Dulce et Decorum Est, uses reality and hellish imagery to portray the war the mode it is. The first line immediately strips the soldiers of all dignity, equate them to old beggars who had turnedbacks to the enemy trenches. They were bent double and cursing through sludge and drunk with run down. The image of defeat, is portrayed through the soldiers being deaf e ven to the hoots of gas shells dropping softly behind. These men no longer see any true value in living, their hellish nightmare of unyielding flares, thick green light and the pertain of the devils sick of sin.Shows war to be an atrocity not fit for humanity. There is no sense of a red crashing game or any sense of fun. Suddenly, the reader wishes they did have a seat in the stand. apart(predicate) from the depiction of warfare, the idea of a noble death or death in war is unlike in these two poems. Whereas, Jessie Pope omits any mention of death or suffering, Owen goes into immensely graphic, borderline gratis(p) detail of the gassing of a man. He describes the man floundring like a man in fire or lime who was drowning in a green sea.The unceremonious word flung describes the way a corpse is disposed. The individual human has been reduced to an object, a corpse that has no real value, and is a burden. Pope, creates an image of injury in war as honourable and respectable. The idea of returning back with a crutch as a heroic sentiment. Of the man who took a bullet and survived. She makes it seem as though there is no real risk of going to war, there is no graphic imagery and any mention of the bad aspects of war is referred to in opposites.It wont be a picnic but from this the reader cannot conjure the image of war as a nightmare, as a hell the way that Owen does with his commentary of the hanging face engaging the visual senses of the reader, the sound of blood come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs the smell obscene as cancer and one can closely taste the vile incurable sores, bitter as plenty on their own innocent tongues. This activation of four major sense immerses the reader in the almost unbelievable scene of war. Even the soldiers in there half trance sate, march asleep, otiose to comprehend their situation.Thus, the audience of Jessie Popes poem is most likely the children ardent for some epic glory described in Dulce et Decorum est. Desperately glorious. Perhaps that is the best way to describe how Pope conceives war. Furthermore, the poems contrast with this idea of patriotism. The quote found on war memorials and that ends Dulce et Decorum est, is attacked in Owens poem whereas it is affirmed in Jessie Popes inspirational call to action and invocation. Wilfred Owen describes the idea of pro patria mori as an old lie. As untenable to anyone who has had any experience of real war.We must consider that Jessie Pope believably never visited the front line and never experience a man dying on her guttering, choking, drowning on his own fluids. The title of Owens poem is ironic, as the entirety of the poem seeks to disprove this notion. If we examine what Jessie Pope uses to make her poem such an effective example of propaganda, of making the idea of pro patrai mori noble, we see the anaphoric repetition of the who question. Of engaging the reader directly, of making the reader feel ashamed for not helping their ca pture country.She uses ctive verbs such as tackle and grip to add to this idea of excitement which is absent in the soldiers poem. Which is absent in truth. In conclusion, we see the whereas Jessie Pope attempts to obscure the truth rough the futility and atrocities of war, Owen, a soldier gives us a confrongtingly realistic portrayal of the death of just one man in a retreat on the western front. Whereas Jessie Pope affirms ideas of jingoism, Owen shows how the soldiers on the front line couldnt care less. Whereas Jessie Pope inherently affirms the idea of dying in war as manly and noble, Owen shows us how unceremoniously and graphic real deaths in war are.