Tok Essay Can We Trust Our Emotions in the Pursuit of Knowledge?

Grade awarded B Criterion A6 Criterion B7 Criterion C6 Criterion D7 Total26 This is a good testify. notwithstanding whatsoever localized difficulties (for example, lines 1011, confusion with the truth tests, line 76, error with a priori) there is some sense of personal engagement and the essay does consistently identify relevant knowledge resolutions. Criterion A Understanding knowledge issues Mark awarded 6 The essay is consistently relevant to the title and there is assure of real ambition and some attempt to use profound ideas (specifically Godels ideas (lines 2026) and the evolutionary ideas of lines 9697).However, the ideas are not always used effectively there is clearly some understanding save it falls short of a good understanding. In particular, there is awareness that the idea of truth is elusive (for example, the introduction and lines 1819) and its meaning is explored in different areas of knowledge (mathematics, art, history, ethics, religion) and everyday events (the Iraq war, the table), but the handling of the issue is uneven and at times inconsistent. Criterion B Knowers perspective Mark awarded 7The essay has a clear student voice, starting with an engaging introduction which understandsbut is not prepared to endorsementtotal skepticism despite the clumsy formulation (lines 45) one senses an awareness of alternative perspectives and a personal stand. The examples are appropriate, varied and reasonably effective (for example, lines 3133, the gamelan lines 2026, a brave, if not alone successful, attempt to concisely explain Godels ideas lines 5155, Texan law lines 5675, Iraq lines 3941, Hiroshima and Nagasaki).The lineament and quantity show that the student can independently link the ideas to personal, academic and real-life situations, and are a warm feature of this essay. Criterion C Quality of analysis of knowledge issues Mark awarded 6 The analysis of issues is weaker than their identification, and the precise links between cont ext and truth are not specified (for example, the examples of the gamelan and Dawkins are both potentially rich but undeveloped).While there is a sense of exploring the idea of truth in different contexts, the interrogatory lacks depth and detail, and some conclusions are not adequately back up (for example, line 18, the conclusion However contexts is supported by examples from non-mathematical contexts line 13, make four because is an apparently unaware argument from authority lines 2026, Godels ideas are not used adequately lines 2830, Perceptions view and place is asserted rather than argued for).It king be argued that the extensive treatment of the Iraq war, while certainly showcasing the students perspective on the issue, might be somewhat polemical rather than carefully argued. Claims of emotive language, colourful fallacies (lines 6768) are not elaborated upon and, in the overall picture of the essay, this example seems to contradict the overall conclusion that Margaret A twood was right when she express that context is all (line 101). Criterion D Organization of ideas