Frankenstein's Attempt to abandon the Creature in the Real Monster Essay

Frankensteins Attempt to abandon the Creature in the substantial junkie - Essay ExampleTherefore, the rhetorical question that rises here is who is the true(a) monster then? On the surface level, it seems that since Dr. Frankenstein has created, he is the real evil or the real monster. But a deeper analysis will necessarily reveal that Dr. Frankenstein as a scientist who is good willed enough to discover the mystery of Nature in direct to remove the imperfection is the monster rather his disposition to abandon his beast (also his failure to socialize it) because of its ghastly appearance is the real monster in this case. The Real Monster Frankensteins Refusal to Socialize the Creature Those who assume Dr. Frankenstein himself as the real monster argue that his attempt to create life is to be interpreted as a monstrous plague against nature and the will of God. The foundation of Frankensteins abomination against Nature is Frankenstein is a rebel against nature when he tries not unaccompanied to find the secret of life but also to remove lifes defects (Rohrmoser 3). Such proposal of marriage that like the legendary Prometheus, Doctor Frankenstein can be held answerable for offense against nature and God is further strengthened by the supposition that eventually Shellys protagonist has been punished by nature for committing such crime. But this proposal most Frankensteins offense against nature confronts a simple question, Does Frankenstein intends to create a monster? Textual evidences eventually will reveal that Doctor Frankenstein has no intention to create a monster rather his sole objective is to amend the natures imperfection by grasping the secrets of life. Indeed his ignorance about how to nurture his creature that apparently looks like an evil causes the final havoc he suffers in the end of the novel. By effectively producing a naive parrotlike being, he primarily propounds that man can grab the secrets of life and death and searching for the s ecrets of life and death is nothing blasphemous. But Frankensteins monstrous crime lies in the fact that he abandons the lab-made creature because of its ghastly look instantly after its birth. Obviously he commits this crime being ignorant of his duty that great knowledge imposes upon him and by refusing to play the motherly role of nurturing the creature. He has not committed any crime by seeking the secrets of life. Creation of a crude Monster A Success of Frankensteins Good-willed Research Mary Shellys attempt to endow the monster with humanly feelings and yearnings fundamentally refutes the claim that the creature is a monster. At the same time it also propounds that Frankensteins research in natures secrets is neither impossible not profane. The ghastly appearance of the creature is not enough to prove that Frankensteins monstrous intention to go against the will of God has failed. Indeed his success lies in the fact that he has successfully created a being that can learn li ke a man that also has humanly yearnings to love and to be loved. The creature wants to have a female one. Such want proves its desire to love and to be loved. Instead of being disgusted by the creatures ghastly appearance, Frankenstein as a responsible scientist could socialize him. But like an ambitious scientists, his ambition drives him to achieve fame without being responsible towards his creation. Frankenstein himself recognizes the flaw of his ambition in the following sentences, How dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge, and how such(prenominal) happier that man is who