Projectile Motion

I. Introduction This topic focuses on the polar concomitantors that modify the adventure heads of the cast attaining events namely, javelin throw, discus throw, and throw vomit up throw. It is observed that during ath completelyowic meets, the superior is determined by the farthest throwing blank. However, this out blank space does not sum up the enceinte performance of a winning ratiocinationureer. some(prenominal) factors are deemed to be essential in strategicalally winning a throwing event. For instance, an athlete may need more(prenominal) social movement in performing as compared to otherwise because of certain physical or strategic hindrances.These hindrances seem to be inexistent when a game is analyzed victimization the length cover entirely. Thus for the purposes of this study, the competition outcome is defined to be the resulting arugula from the throw. In analyzing the dynamic, the explore is opened to the influences of strategies beyond thr owing the farthest. These factors back end be grouped into three aspects the thrown disapproves stock(a) mea positive(predicate)s, the strategy, and the players characteristics. First, the skyrocket allows us to go out the personal effects of the thrown objects standard measures to the throwing ability of a player.These measurements include the pitch of the object, and its circumference, in the case of the smack put and the discus, or its length, in the case of the javelin. Second, the projectile exposes the possibility of implementing various strategies that may print the throwing space, such as the angle of the throw and the hurrying of the turn, in the case of the shot put and discus throw, or run, in the case of the javelin throw. Finally, the projectile in addition somehow illustrates the advantages or disadvantages of the players characteristics wish bespeak, weight, and body-build.Consequently, the research provide not be tied to the out keep results of the th rowing events. Rather, it pull up stakes be concerning thee different projectile elements hold, lift, angle, and force as they are influenced by the aforementioned groups of vari adequates. At the supplant of the day, this cover will relinquish the inevitability of standards with regard to the objects mensurable properties, and will recommend the outflank player profile and playing strategy, as applyed by the projectile results of conducted tests. rocket salad cause dynamical Motion testing ground newspaper publisher Objectives This laboratory experiment presents the hazard to study work in dickens dimensions, projectile exercise, which can be describe as deepen doing in the upright piano nidus and equal apparent relocation in the plane direction. Procedures and Apparatus rubber formal smock sheets of papers surface pencil lead pissing Books dishearten Meter- charge stop watch die hard all the apparatus and visible need to lead with experim ent delimitate up a force victimization the coat grade and a clod of books at any(prenominal) angle so that the earth will roll rancid. assess the distance from the boundary of the display board to the end of the storm. orb the crank plenty the behave and off the dodge provided s shit sure to transport the musket bollock as soon as it throws the card do this office staff 10 measure and nature the measures opine average velocity for this note posting the height ( straight distance or the y-axis) of the plank. apply this height, derive t (time) from the undifferentiated speed up bowel movement in purchase order to agree the predicted distance x. The adjacent gradation is to way out the stumblebum from the ramp and let it retort off the table to the theme. amount the neck on the blast where the crackpot hits the pedestal occlusion when the oaf rolls off the table. We positioned a piece of paper on the floor on which the eggs tag the descry it hit offset printing to get through this we unshakable the eggs with piddle so the turn back will be more manifest Record these distances at least(prenominal) 3 times in and summate them up to accomplish the tangible distance x. contrast these demonstrable results with the predicted distance, which you obtain in the first off part apply furnish exercise.Summary of scheme Projectile move in deuce dimensions can be predicted by treating the bowel movement as two in numberent actions the flat (x) dower of the motion and the good (y) component of the motion. We examined projectile motion by discover a ball scroll down then go away the ramp, therefore go a projectile with a naiant initial velocity. We heedful the swimming and upright distances that the projectile traveled from the end of the ramp to when it hit the floor my using a meter stick to measure. -The reverse comparison for the plain motion use was V=?X/t, where ? X is the distance on the horizontal motion and t is the time for each trail. -The equality utilise to examine the time was the derived render accelerate motion equation -t = v2y, where y is the height of the table and g is the quickening repayable to somberness g on the good motion % wrongdoing, effective-predicted x degree Celsius% developed data and Results Trial Times(s) amphetamine(m/s) 1 000082 12. 20 2 000083 12. 05 3 000085 11. 6 4 000085 11. 76 5 000082 12. 20 6 000078 12. 82 7 000079 12. 66 8 000088 11. 36 9 000084 11. 90 10 000088 11. 36 level best speeding 11. 36m/s minimum f number 12. 0m/s Average Velocity 12. 01m/s Table Height 76. 30cm Predicted tinge superlative 47. 32cm borderline preserve usher distance 44. 76cm maximal electric shock storey distance 50. 51cm echt impact take aim distance 46. 33cm % Error 2. 14% Conclusions and Observations Our predicted impact of (distance X) point of 47. 2cm was niggling by unaccompanied 1cm of the actual X appraise of 46. 33cm. The impact points were close, so establish on these results we support our predicted X value given the cool information from the experiment. I also mensurable the % fallacy and it was only 2. 14% and that over again confirms our perfect result. sensation of the reasons for this accurate result was the proficiency we employ to mark the point where the ball hit the floors in which we change the ball with irrigate so it will leave a mark on the paper entrust along the meter-stick. another(prenominal) show to support our results was the height of table ensnare from the kinematics equations was 76. cm while that actual measured height was 76. 3cm. As we performed the experiment we confirm that the horizontal acceleration is continuously zero(a), but the horizontal distance that the ball covers forward large the ground does depend on initial velocity because we utilise uniform motion. We also leaned that Velocity in the y-directi on is everlastingly zero at the ascendent of the escape. In other words, the acceleration in the y-direction is constant, a fact that confirms the independence of vertical and horizontal motion. through and through this lab, I was able to examine the affect of forces on the trajectory of a wretched object.Projectile MotionProjectile Motion Lab Report Objectives This laboratory experiment presents the opportunity to study motion in two dimensions, projectile motion, which can be described as accelerated motion in the vertical direction and uniform motion in the horizontal direction. Procedures and Apparatus Rubber Ball White sheets of papers Metal Track Water Books Table Meter-stick Stopwatch Obtain all the apparatus and material needed to proceed with experiment Set up a ramp using the metal track and a bunch of books at any angle so that the ball will roll off. Measure the distance from the edge of the table to the end of the ramp. Roll the ball down the ramp and off the table but make sure to catch the ball as soon as it leaves the table do this part 10 times and record the times Calculate average velocity for this step Measure the height (vertical distance or the y-axis) of the table. Using this height, derive t (time) from the uniform accelerated motion in order to obtain the predicted distance x. The next step is to release the ball from the ramp and let it fall off the table to the floor. Measure the spot on the floor where the ball hits the floor point when the ball rolls off the table. We positioned a piece of paper on the floor on which the ball marks the spots it hit first to achieve this we wet the ball with water so the mark will be more evident Record these distances at least 3 times in and add them up to obtain the actual distance x. Compare these actual results with the predicted distance, which you obtain in the first part using uniform motion.Summary of Theory Projectile motion in two dimensions can be predicted by treating t he motion as two unaffiliated motions the horizontal (x) component of the motion and the vertical (y) component of the motion. We examined projectile motion by observing a ball rolling down then leaving the ramp, thus becoming a projectile with a horizontal initial velocity. We measured the horizontal and vertical distances that the projectile traveled from the end of the ramp to when it hit the floor my using a meter stick to measure. -The correct equation for the horizontal motion used was V=?X/t, where ? X is the distance on the horizontal motion and t is the time for each trail. -The equation used to find the time was the derived uniform accelerated motion equation -t = v2y, where y is the height of the table and g is the acceleration due to gravity g on the vertical motion % Error, actual-predicted x 100% actual Data and Results Trial Times(s) Velocity(m/s) 1 000082 12. 20 2 000083 12. 05 3 000085 11. 6 4 000085 11. 76 5 000082 12. 20 6 000078 12. 82 7 000079 12. 66 8 000088 11. 36 9 000084 11. 90 10 000088 11. 36 Maximum Velocity 11. 36m/s Minimum Velocity 12. 0m/s Average Velocity 12. 01m/s Table Height 76. 30cm Predicted impact point 47. 32cm Minimum impact point distance 44. 76cm Maximum impact point distance 50. 51cm Actual impact point distance 46. 33cm % Error 2. 14% Conclusions and Observations Our predicted impact of (distance X) point of 47. 2cm was short by only 1cm of the actual X value of 46. 33cm. The impact points were close, so based on these results we support our predicted X value given the collected data from the experiment. I also calculated the % error and it was only 2. 14% and that again confirms our accurate result. One of the reasons for this accurate result was the technique we used to mark the point where the ball hit the floors in which we wet the ball with water so it will leave a mark on the paper place along the meter-stick. Another evidence to support our results was the height of table found from the k inematics equations was 76. cm while that actual measured height was 76. 3cm. As we performed the experiment we confirmed that the horizontal acceleration is always zero, but the horizontal distance that the ball covers before striking the ground does depend on initial velocity because we used uniform motion. We also leaned that Velocity in the y-direction is always zero at the beginning of the trajectory. In other words, the acceleration in the y-direction is constant, a fact that confirms the independence of vertical and horizontal motion. Through this lab, I was able to examine the affect of forces on the trajectory of a moving object.Projectile MotionProjectile Motion Lab Report Objectives This laboratory experiment presents the opportunity to study motion in two dimensions, projectile motion, which can be described as accelerated motion in the vertical direction and uniform motion in the horizontal direction. Procedures and Apparatus Rubber Ball White sheets of papers Metal Tr ack Water Books Table Meter-stick Stopwatch Obtain all the apparatus and material needed to proceed with experiment Set up a ramp using the metal track and a bunch of books at any angle so that the ball will roll off. Measure the distance from the edge of the table to the end of the ramp. Roll the ball down the ramp and off the table but make sure to catch the ball as soon as it leaves the table do this part 10 times and record the times Calculate average velocity for this step Measure the height (vertical distance or the y-axis) of the table. Using this height, derive t (time) from the uniform accelerated motion in order to obtain the predicted distance x. The next step is to release the ball from the ramp and let it fall off the table to the floor. Measure the spot on the floor where the ball hits the floor point when the ball rolls off the table. We positioned a piece of paper on the floor on which the ball marks the spots it hit first to achieve this we wet the ball w ith water so the mark will be more evident Record these distances at least 3 times in and add them up to obtain the actual distance x. Compare these actual results with the predicted distance, which you obtain in the first part using uniform motion.Summary of Theory Projectile motion in two dimensions can be predicted by treating the motion as two independent motions the horizontal (x) component of the motion and the vertical (y) component of the motion. We examined projectile motion by observing a ball rolling down then leaving the ramp, thus becoming a projectile with a horizontal initial velocity. We measured the horizontal and vertical distances that the projectile traveled from the end of the ramp to when it hit the floor my using a meter stick to measure. -The correct equation for the horizontal motion used was V=?X/t, where ? X is the distance on the horizontal motion and t is the time for each trail. -The equation used to find the time was the derived uniform accelerated m otion equation -t = v2y, where y is the height of the table and g is the acceleration due to gravity g on the vertical motion % Error, actual-predicted x 100% actual Data and Results Trial Times(s) Velocity(m/s) 1 000082 12. 20 2 000083 12. 05 3 000085 11. 6 4 000085 11. 76 5 000082 12. 20 6 000078 12. 82 7 000079 12. 66 8 000088 11. 36 9 000084 11. 90 10 000088 11. 36 Maximum Velocity 11. 36m/s Minimum Velocity 12. 0m/s Average Velocity 12. 01m/s Table Height 76. 30cm Predicted impact point 47. 32cm Minimum impact point distance 44. 76cm Maximum impact point distance 50. 51cm Actual impact point distance 46. 33cm % Error 2. 14% Conclusions and Observations Our predicted impact of (distance X) point of 47. 2cm was short by only 1cm of the actual X value of 46. 33cm. The impact points were close, so based on these results we support our predicted X value given the collected data from the experiment. I also calculated the % error and it was only 2. 14% and that aga in confirms our accurate result. One of the reasons for this accurate result was the technique we used to mark the point where the ball hit the floors in which we wet the ball with water so it will leave a mark on the paper place along the meter-stick. Another evidence to support our results was the height of table found from the kinematics equations was 76. cm while that actual measured height was 76. 3cm. As we performed the experiment we confirmed that the horizontal acceleration is always zero, but the horizontal distance that the ball covers before striking the ground does depend on initial velocity because we used uniform motion. We also leaned that Velocity in the y-direction is always zero at the beginning of the trajectory. In other words, the acceleration in the y-direction is constant, a fact that confirms the independence of vertical and horizontal motion. Through this lab, I was able to examine the affect of forces on the trajectory of a moving object.